100 Endgames You Must Know Pgn |LINK|
100 Endgames You Must Know Pgn >>>>> https://cinurl.com/2tapJW
What I meant to say was that we see these symbols in books written by grandmasters and other chess writers, but I don't know if there are any books which follow the Informant notation without using the traditional symbols as well. --MaoKuo (talk) 16:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Interesting approach, Cobblet. As you point out, a reader who isn't familiar with the chess literature will have no idea what they mean. However, given that there is a chess manual out there which suggests these symbols in the past, I don't think we should be too dogmatic in not using them. Why do we care about the space problem? --MaoKuo (talk) 02:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The Informant notation for evaluation was introduced by B.D. Keene in his book on the endgame, Lee and Keene: The Chess Book , published in 1941. It's the same notation that's used in scientific papers and the like. I'm not sure how many of us are familiar with it, but I for one don't recall having seen it before. If you're not familiar with it, what's the harm in using it? --MaoKuo (talk) 03:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
E-mailing these two has been the single most important feature of this software. You've also found all the articles in Boggle that matched the pattern Puck, which was the text of the email. You should pay attention to the discussion on the Talk page about the issue of marking points to show that a move is a check. And if you're on a Windows computer you can install a chess client, or use a web-based chess program. Eventually I'll be sure to add the links to the various chess programs available. Cheers! Lakota (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, I just made the Chess descriptions and naming conventions page, seeing as I'm working on the Chess Index I've started (and actually haven't been working on, I was just talking with someone). And to be honest I didn't even know there was something like this! But I suppose it will be a useful page for anyone doing a major reorganization of the articles (and therefore the index as well). Cheers! 827ec27edc